RESUMO
Background: Disrespect and patient mistreatment are identified as barriers to care-seeking and low uptake of facility-based deliveries. These mitigating factors have led to slow progress in the achievement of maternal and child health targets, especially in Ghana. Group antenatal care, as an alternative to individual antenatal was implemented to explore the impact on outcomes, including mothers' perception of respectful care. Methods: A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted in 14 health facilities across four districts in the Easter Region of Ghana. These facilities were randomized to intervention or control using a matched pair. Data was collected at several timepoints: enrollment (Time 0), 34 weeks gestation to 3 weeks post-delivery (Time 1), 6 to 12 weeks post-delivery (Time 2), 5 to 8 months post-delivery (Time 3), and 11 to 14 months post-delivery (Time 4). Questions related to respectful care were asked at Time 2, while a focus group discussion (FGDs) was conducted as part of a process evaluation to examine participants' experiences about respectful maternity care. Results: The findings from the intervention group indicate that participants perceived higher levels of respect in comparison to the control group. Privacy and con dentiality were maintained. They believed they had been provided with adequate information, education, and counseling, empowering them to make informed decisions. Participants perceived a shortened waiting time and reduced discrimination in care provision. Generally, there were higher levels of satisfaction with antenatal care. Conclusion: The provision of respectful maternity care, which is essential to increasing healthcare utilization, has been demonstrated to correlate positively with group antenatal care.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To explore the psychosocial concerns and ways of coping of pregnant women with chronic hepatitis B infection in Ghana. SETTING: Participants were selected from public health facilities in the Tema Metropolis. DESIGN: Exploratory descriptive qualitative design was employed. PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen pregnant women were purposively selected to participate in face-to-face interviews. The data were analysed using the content analysis procedure. RESULTS: The participants' psychosocial concerns and coping strategies were diverse. A significant number of the participants were concerned about the impact their hepatitis B seropositivity would have on their relationships, finances, and general well-being. Specifically, they feared that their social network, especially their spouses, would perceive them as having led a promiscuous lifestyle in the past to acquire hepatitis B infection. Also, fear of transmitting the infection to their infants and the effects of the infection on their infants later in life were identified as major concerns by nearly all participants. The participants further reported feelings of distress and diminished self-esteem. These psychosocial afflictions reported were attributed to lack of pre-test counselling during the antenatal care period. However, the participants coped using different strategies, including avoidance/denial, spirituality, and alternative treatment use. CONCLUSION: To achieve optimal psychological and social well-being of pregnant women with chronic hepatitis B, it is important that their unique challenges are considered in their care and treatment cascade. Explicitly, protocols for supportive care addressing the specific needs of pregnant women with chronic hepatitis B should be implemented in the study setting.
